This retro video starring Phillip Zimbardo is an interesting look at "the self" from a psychological perspective. There may be a few tips to pick up in here. The way we present ourselves is interpreted by those around us which then reinforces our self perceptions.
The video can be found here : http://www.learner.org/series/discoveringpsychology/15/e15expand.html
Face to Face vs Face Time
This is one of those studies with results you may have suspected all along.
This study finds the mere presence of a phone on the table while people are interacting can act as a barrier to social bonding.
We believe our cell phone use is out of control. Instead of facilitating communication it has begun to hinder it. Our suggestion is for all of us to make a conscious effort from time to time to be free from our devices. We can do this either when visiting with friends or when sitting on a bench on a sunny day or going out for a walk or even when taking public transport. We suggest a trial run of turning off the ringer, of taking out our ear buds of un-glueing our eyes from our screens for a few moments a day when we can. Lets conduct our own experiment and to see if these small changes have any impact on our moods,on our level of human interaction and our overall well-being.
I've posted the article with the study below:
You sit down for a chat with a new acquaintance but before you're even
started they've placed their phone carefully on the table in front of
them. Why? Are they waiting for a call? Do they just enjoy marvelling at
its chic plastic beauty? Either way, a new study suggests this familiar
habit could be interfering with our attempts to socialise.
Andrew Przybylski and Netta Weinstein asked 34 pairs of strangers to spend 10 minutes chatting to each other about "an interesting event that occurred to you over the past month". The participants sat on chairs in a private booth and for half of them, close by but out of their direct line of view, a mobile phone was placed on a table-top. For the other pairs, there was a note-book in place of the phone.
After they'd finished chatting, the participants answered questions about the partner they'd met. The ones who'd chatted with a phone visible nearby, as opposed to a notebook, were less positive. For example, they were less likely to agree with the statement "It is likely that my partner and I could become friends if we interacted a lot". They also reported feeling less closely related to their conversational partner.
A second study with a fresh set of participants was similar, but this time some of the 34 pairs of strangers chatted about a mundane topic, whilst others chatted about "the most meaningful events of the past year." Again, some of them did this with a phone placed nearby, others with a notebook in the same position.
For participants with the notebook visible nearby, having a more meaningful conversation (as opposed to a casual one) boosted their feelings of closeness and their trust in their conversational partner. But this extra intimacy was missing for the participants for whom a mobile phone was visible. When the researchers debriefed the participants afterwards they seemed to be unaware of the effects of the mobile phone, suggesting its adverse effects were at a non-conscious level.
Why should the mere presence of a mobile phone interfere with feelings of social intimacy in this way? Przybylski and Weinstein can't be sure, but they think that modern mobile phones might trigger in the mind automatic thoughts about wider social networks, which has the effect of crowding out face-to-face conversations. Considered in this way, the present findings are an extension of the wider literature on what's known as non-conscious priming (for example, the presence of a brief-case makes people more competitive).
A weakness of the study is that the researchers didn't compare the effects of the presence of a mobile phone against an old-fashioned land-line phone, or other forms of technology. So it's not clear how specific the effect is to mobile phones.
Also, as the authors acknowledge, this is just a preliminary observation that poses all sorts of future questions requiring further research. For example, did the presence of a mobile phone alter the behaviour and conversational style of the participants, or did it merely change their perceptions of the social experience? Would the effects be the same for people who are already in a close relationship?
But for now, Przybylski and Weinstein concluded: "These results indicate that mobile communication devices may, by their mere presence, paradoxically hold the potential to facilitate as well as to disrupt human bonding and intimacy."
_________________________________
Andrew K. Przybylski, and Netta Weinstein (2012). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal
This study finds the mere presence of a phone on the table while people are interacting can act as a barrier to social bonding.
We believe our cell phone use is out of control. Instead of facilitating communication it has begun to hinder it. Our suggestion is for all of us to make a conscious effort from time to time to be free from our devices. We can do this either when visiting with friends or when sitting on a bench on a sunny day or going out for a walk or even when taking public transport. We suggest a trial run of turning off the ringer, of taking out our ear buds of un-glueing our eyes from our screens for a few moments a day when we can. Lets conduct our own experiment and to see if these small changes have any impact on our moods,on our level of human interaction and our overall well-being.
I've posted the article with the study below:
How the mere presence of a mobile phone harms face-to-face conversations
Andrew Przybylski and Netta Weinstein asked 34 pairs of strangers to spend 10 minutes chatting to each other about "an interesting event that occurred to you over the past month". The participants sat on chairs in a private booth and for half of them, close by but out of their direct line of view, a mobile phone was placed on a table-top. For the other pairs, there was a note-book in place of the phone.
After they'd finished chatting, the participants answered questions about the partner they'd met. The ones who'd chatted with a phone visible nearby, as opposed to a notebook, were less positive. For example, they were less likely to agree with the statement "It is likely that my partner and I could become friends if we interacted a lot". They also reported feeling less closely related to their conversational partner.
A second study with a fresh set of participants was similar, but this time some of the 34 pairs of strangers chatted about a mundane topic, whilst others chatted about "the most meaningful events of the past year." Again, some of them did this with a phone placed nearby, others with a notebook in the same position.
For participants with the notebook visible nearby, having a more meaningful conversation (as opposed to a casual one) boosted their feelings of closeness and their trust in their conversational partner. But this extra intimacy was missing for the participants for whom a mobile phone was visible. When the researchers debriefed the participants afterwards they seemed to be unaware of the effects of the mobile phone, suggesting its adverse effects were at a non-conscious level.
Why should the mere presence of a mobile phone interfere with feelings of social intimacy in this way? Przybylski and Weinstein can't be sure, but they think that modern mobile phones might trigger in the mind automatic thoughts about wider social networks, which has the effect of crowding out face-to-face conversations. Considered in this way, the present findings are an extension of the wider literature on what's known as non-conscious priming (for example, the presence of a brief-case makes people more competitive).
A weakness of the study is that the researchers didn't compare the effects of the presence of a mobile phone against an old-fashioned land-line phone, or other forms of technology. So it's not clear how specific the effect is to mobile phones.
Also, as the authors acknowledge, this is just a preliminary observation that poses all sorts of future questions requiring further research. For example, did the presence of a mobile phone alter the behaviour and conversational style of the participants, or did it merely change their perceptions of the social experience? Would the effects be the same for people who are already in a close relationship?
But for now, Przybylski and Weinstein concluded: "These results indicate that mobile communication devices may, by their mere presence, paradoxically hold the potential to facilitate as well as to disrupt human bonding and intimacy."
_________________________________
Andrew K. Przybylski, and Netta Weinstein (2012). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal
New Research on the Benefits of using Positive Redemptive Language when discussing Alcoholism and Recovery
New Research out of UBC finds a correlation between people's use of redemptive language when speaking about their struggles with Alcohol Abuse and the length of their sobriety. Essentially they are trying to find scientific evidence to support the notion that people who are able to put a positive spin on their difficult stories will fare better on their road to recovery. Although the power of positive thinking and redemptive self growth in the face of adversity is something many people would instinctively agree with it has important implications for public health programs when these things find scientific support.
Here is what they say on their website:
Here is what they say on their website: